I sent e-mails to Rep. Jeb Hensarling, Rep. Betty Brown, Becky Oliver over at http://www.myfoxdfw.com/myfox/, and many more. I claimed to have cured Basal Cell Carcinoma on myself. I volunteered to duplicate my results under medical supervisoin of their choice. NO TAKERS. You woud think that a claim to have cured Basal Cell skin cancer would warant SOME interest, even if just to try and prove me wrong. The federal government claims that cannabis has NO MEDICAL VALUE. They are LYING to all of you. It's not the usual kind of bs that happens all the time. This kind of lying is killing far too many of you. I need help. I am asking yours. Please send an e-mail to Becky Oliver, asking her to investigate my claim. This is far to important for me to lay down on. I need your help.
I NEED HELP
I am going to the Veterans Administration Medical Center Dermatology clinic in Dallas on 19, August, at 13:00hrs(1:00pm). They, I believe, are going to perform follow up biopsies on the two lesions I have cured with cannabis oil. I'll keep ya'll posted.
I went to the VA on the 19th. The appointment was made by the VA for the sole purpose of examining the two lesions I have been treating. The opinion of both doctors was: the upper lesion needed more treatment, confirming what I felt. The lower lesion was CURED. No sign of cancer was present. To me this is confirmation by the fed that compounds in the cannabis plant can cure cancer.
Did they give you some kind of results that you could publish and we could use to promote the benefits of Medical use?
Well, went to the VA. Was told one lesion appeared to have no cancer present. The other appeared to need more treatment. Two doctors agreed that there appeared to be no cancer present. You will notice that the word "appeared" shows up a number of times. One said that he would not have requested a biopsy for the lower site, IF he had not been aware of my previous history with skin cancer. They ABSOLUTELY REFUSE to put any of that into my records. Perhaps it was because I refused to let them do a biopsy. I have a total of three lesions I'm treating. I will give them their biopsy when all are ready. Besides, it will be harder for them to say too much against my claim. Well, if it's absolute proof they want, three should be enough, at least to get them thhinking.
I wish someone who had a lawyer they could talk to, to figure out if they can actualy refuse to put their statements into my records, would do so, and let me know here. I'm just a poor boy who can't afford to walk into an attorneys office and hear, "yes I can talk to you, that will be 3million dollars please", if you know what I mean? If they can, I will be forced to submit to the needle and the knife AGAIN, for the biopsies, which I am loath to do. If they can't, then I have a position of power to work from. As things stand now, I am just a pain in the ass, and easily dismisssed. HELP.
Ironman......no kidding. You sir are an inspiration.
Leon
keep up the good work man. I've found the same benefits of canabis with my Crohns disease. It put me back into remission. Absolutely no flare-ups anymore unless I feel pressure on my side. We need a SAFER or DFW
Finaly gave them the biopsies they wanted. I should have the results in a couple of weeks. I will post them here, and every where else I can.
Iron man,
Are you going to attend the next meeting? I'd like to meet you, a fellow vet, and discuss some of the items you have mentioned in this thread. Besides, I think I was the oldest one to attend the last meeting. Hell, if we keep it up, we might need a geriatric section like they do in California NORML meetings .
DudeMaster
The results, I'm sorry to say, came back positive. To me this simply means I need to treat more. If a doctor used an antibioitic cream to treat an infection, and saw that it wasn't completely gone, he would probably continue to treat with the cream. IE that is what I intend to do. Well, when I come up with enough money to make some more oil.
unfortunately it isn't. i believe you though. there are well-documented cases and even some laboratory evidence. check out http://www.phoenixtears.ca/ if you haven't already. pretty interesting stuff...
i've wondered for a while what it takes from a legal perspective to prove the government wrong. the government itself provides pot for four people. how can they claim it has no medical value if they themselves are giving it to 4 people? i imagine they can claim it's part of a study that is not yet conclusive... but more importantly, there is the mountain of scientific evidence proving marijuana's medical value, the various medical associations that endorse it, the many states that have passed laws recognizing it. if that's not enough, what is?
i'm really curious if someone with a legal background can comment on that. or any pointers...